EXAMINE THIS REPORT ON BREACH OF CONDITION CASE LAW PDF

Examine This Report on breach of condition case law pdf

Examine This Report on breach of condition case law pdf

Blog Article

Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

The lots of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made apparent that police is free to get action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities issue to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-field duties in the interim period. Read more

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

However it is actually made very clear that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities issue to law. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make certain respect on the family get rid of in accordance with regulation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate for a issue of security of the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been achieved. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated previously mentioned. Read more

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight presented to any reported judgment may well rely on the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[7]

11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents from the boy or Female tend not to approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they're able to do if they're able to Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly-settled that even though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to consider the advantage of each of the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of suitable candidates that are case law found being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded through the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of your respondent department.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police is usually to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, guarantee law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple experienced two youthful children of their own at home, the social worker did not explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to your court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement during the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair experienced youthful children.

Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page